Vanguard Spheres  

Welcome to the Vanguard Spheres forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view our discussions, articles/interviews and photo galleries. By joining our community you will gain access to post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features and tools like our upcoming Guild Management Tool (GMT). Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

As a bonus this banner will disappear once you are registered! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Home Forums WikiSphere Gallery Chat Arcade Today's Posts
Go Back   Vanguard Spheres > Community > The Worlds Beyond
Register FAQ Members List Who's Online Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: IF Sigil used "spyware" to sniff out cheaters
You wouldn't play Vanguard 6 15.00%
You would play but not like the fact Sigil is doing this. 9 22.50%
You would play and don't care that they use "spyware" 23 57.50%
Hmmm I will have to think about this and post later. 2 5.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2007, 08:54 PM   #21 (permalink)
TheKnight
Senior Member
 
TheKnight's Avatar
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 02-02-2008 04:16 PM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hollywood, MD
Posts: 301

Level: 16

HP: 24 / 380
MP: 100 / 2902
EXP: 22%
Send a message via AIM to TheKnight Send a message via MSN to TheKnight Send a message via Yahoo to TheKnight
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

Yeah he lost like 2 60 characters and a 40, plus a few other asorded guys.
__________________
A knyght ther was, and that a worthy man, That fro the tyme that he first bigan To riden out, he lobed chivalrie, Throuthe and honour, fredom and curtesie. Ful worthy was he in his lordes werre, And thereto hadde he riden, no man ferre, As wel in cristendom as in hethenesse, and ever honoured for his worthynesse.
TheKnight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 07:17 PM   #22 (permalink)
TheWizza
Junior Member
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 03-07-2007 12:29 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15

Level: 2

HP: 0 / 40
MP: 5 / 224
EXP: 62%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pirotess View Post
Im completely against any type of spyware software being used regardless of how well intentioned the company putting it there is. I'd like to see them put more effort into securing their systems so hacks/bots/cheats cant be used from the client instead of figuring out how to invade my machine.
exactly, Warden is a cheap, easy, quick, system that makes catching cheaters easy... because it looks into everything running on your pc and then checks its hash against the known cheats list (and if you can find it they have found it).

If they had taken more time and money (and if they had cared about their customers just a little bit) they could easily have designed the game to flag macroers (and to a lesser degree "botters" because they dont repeat a cycle but are usually flagged by players anyways for the GMs) by noticing repeating cycles. I helped write a system like this for a MUD once years ago. It was not difficult to have the game check character files for usage stats and flag them for inspection. We automatically took samples from people logged in for more than 5 hours that day and checked the the actions, times, movements, and any chat and it logged it if it met the cheat, hacking, botting criteria.
__________________
Beta Server 1:
Phelony DarDwarf: level 9 Dwarf/Warrior
TheWizza is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 10:43 AM   #23 (permalink)
dprundle
Member
 
dprundle's Avatar
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 03-26-2007 08:06 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 73

Level: 7

HP: 3 / 161
MP: 24 / 870
EXP: 46%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

Hell yes I'd mind if they wanted to put a process sniffer on my computer. I wouldn't let them put a camera in my house to monitor me nor would I want them sniffing around on my computer where I keep my SS#, CC#'s, etc etc. Blizzard has no right for this. Why should I be monitored because their servers weren't coded well enough to stop the cheaters?
dprundle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 01:53 PM   #24 (permalink)
Fyrestrom
Senior Member
 
Fyrestrom's Avatar
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 07-26-2008 11:32 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 377

Level: 18

HP: 47 / 427
MP: 125 / 2321
EXP: 10%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by dprundle View Post
Hell yes I'd mind if they wanted to put a process sniffer on my computer. I wouldn't let them put a camera in my house to monitor me nor would I want them sniffing around on my computer where I keep my SS#, CC#'s, etc etc. Blizzard has no right for this. Why should I be monitored because their servers weren't coded well enough to stop the cheaters?
But people have no problem pumping in their personal information to pay for the game they play. Credit Card number, address, phone number, email address. Have you read the privacy policies? Who has time to read all that when all they want is to get into the game? I understand some people don't pay by credit, but maybe they bought the game card on a debit card. Somewhere out there, your numbers are floating around. How paranoid do you want to be?
Fyrestrom is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 05:58 PM   #25 (permalink)
Tombstone
Junior Member
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 03-03-2007 12:09 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 23

Level: 3

HP: 0 / 63
MP: 7 / 338
EXP: 52%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

I'm against cheating (Bots, buying gold, etc.) so yes, I'm happy that WoW killed all those accounts. I wouldn't have a problem with Vanguard doing it..
Tombstone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 12:06 PM   #26 (permalink)
larscw
Junior Member
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 01-24-2008 03:49 AM
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 14

Level: 2

HP: 0 / 37
MP: 4 / 201
EXP: 50%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

I would mind Vanguard doing this, I think they would be more then able to just monitor players activity on the server. if a player has unnatural high level gain, online times, income, just name it they could check into this and see where it came from.

Sure this would take more effort and I think Blizzard really went the easy way by accessing the pc's themselves. Can't say i like the thought of any company doing such thing though.

Wouldn't it for example be a sollution if the game would use a port and while the game run the rest would be locked off that wouldn't be needed for gameplay?

If this would be a sollution then, sure doing anything else then playing the game wouldn't be possible but atleast things like privacy would remain guarrenteed. Then if some program would open a port then game would either shut down, after mentioning this or through giving the game admin rights just refusing access.
__________________
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _._._.
Harras a gnome or 2 a day to take your boredom away:-)
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _._._.
larscw is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 01:48 PM   #27 (permalink)
tehgeek
Senior Member
 
tehgeek's Avatar
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 07-11-2007 06:18 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Telon
Posts: 291

Level: 15

HP: 31 / 373
MP: 97 / 2089
EXP: 95%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by larscw View Post
Wouldn't it for example be a sollution if the game would use a port and while the game run the rest would be locked off that wouldn't be needed for gameplay?

If this would be a sollution then, sure doing anything else then playing the game wouldn't be possible but atleast things like privacy would remain guarrenteed. Then if some program would open a port then game would either shut down, after mentioning this or through giving the game admin rights just refusing access.
Some of these "cheat" programs don't open ports though. I agree with what you said in the first two paragraphs though. I for one would cancel my subscription after being treated like a cheater (spyware to monitor me/my computer). If you want to catch cheaters, do it server side with all that data you get/store.
__________________
O
O..O

Site Supporter
......V A N G U A R D .. S P H E R E S.........
A n .. O f f i c i a l .. A f f i l i a t e .. F a n s i t e....

:: Acerbus :: Class - Druid :: LvL - 19 :: Server - Thunderaxe ::
tehgeek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 02:38 PM   #28 (permalink)
Shinto
Senior Member
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 07-12-2008 01:45 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 354

Level: 17

HP: 43 / 414
MP: 118 / 2247
EXP: 56%
Re: WoW bans/closes 76,000 accounts

If your computer is connected to the internet, even through a standard firewall, chances are that you have already been scanned by someone. That said, while I do not like the idea of someone routinely scanning my data, I would rather it be Sigil than some random hacker. If they ever bring me up on a false positive, I'll likely delete the game and break the disks, but until then, as much as I may dislike it, I would continue to play even with such scanners.
__________________
Visit my WikiSphere User Page!
Level 33 Horseshoesmith
Shinto is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Vanguard Spheres > Community > The Worlds Beyond


LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.vanguardspheres.com/forums/worlds-beyond/6906-wow-bans-closes-76-000-accounts.html
Posted By For Type Date
Home This thread Refback 12-25-2006 01:08 AM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.



SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Regency Sword © T. King @ Tkingart.com
Trademarks are the property of Sigil Games Online, Inc.
Game content and materials copyright Sigil Games Online, Inc. All rights reserved.