![]() |
|
Welcome to the Vanguard Spheres forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view our discussions, articles/interviews and photo galleries. By joining our community you will gain access to post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features and tools like our upcoming Guild Management Tool (GMT). Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! As a bonus this banner will disappear once you are registered! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
i think warriors should just be able to duel weild, i mean paladin and dread knight, doesnt fit to duel wield, but for warriors they are supposed to do the most DPS of tanks, and besides warriors should be able to use EVERYTHING to make up for the loss of magic, i mean why not? if a warrior duel wields, they do not use a shield, they have less armor but more dmg, this would make them usefull to a group without HAVING to tank, i mean, warriors should pretty much always tank yes but if im a warrior going with a group of friends who have a warrior tanking already to play around, i would switch to duel wield and have some fun!
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
Don't need no steenking Shield
Back in the old days of EQ tanking, I don't think I ever saw a war tank with a shield, but then they didn't need to as long as their healers knew their game.
I think the one obstacle Tanks in general will have to overcome is the "WoW Mentality." I'm not trying to be incendiary with that comment either. Let's face it, Vanguard is being made by the folks who created EQ. From a tanking perspective, those who never tanked in EQ have some catching up to do. The theory is the same, but the practice (between EQ tanking and WoW tanking) is hugely different. The folks who only know WoW are at a disadvantage if they keep clinging to the dynamics/mechanics of that game and expect it to hold true in Vanguard. To be fair, so would any EQ tank who expected the "tanking experience" in Vanguard to be exactly the same. It just seems that the learning curve for a WoW-only tank will be much steeper. |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
|
Re: Don't need no steenking Shield
Quote:
EQ1 tanks basically did agro by damage, that's why no shields (never had a tank there, healer all the way), while WoW (and others, eg DAoC) agro was gained by taunt abilities, so the shield's mitigation was more important than the higher damage from 2H/DW. Even in the few days since beta5 start, I have seen lots of warriors wasting their energy bar on damage abilities and then struggle with keeping agro when no energy for taunts is left. A DAoC or WoW tank need to safe their endurance/rage for taunting strikes or sunder armour/revenge, you would be very fast a "former MT" if you open up with damage strikes. So it looks more that EQ1 veterans need to adopt. If you talking about the willingness and knowledge to change, true I would trust somebody from EQ1 more than from WoW, but thats another story ![]() P. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |||
|
Member
|
Re: Don't need no steenking Shield
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|