![]() |
|
Welcome to the Vanguard Spheres forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view our discussions, articles/interviews and photo galleries. By joining our community you will gain access to post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features and tools like our upcoming Guild Management Tool (GMT). Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! As a bonus this banner will disappear once you are registered! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
|
Paladin... The Anti-Dread Knight?
Quote:
Not asking for assumptions, just speculation. PS. At work on a crappy monitor ( too dark even at the brightest setting ) so having trouble telling if the quote entered correctly. Will re-edit this post after I get home if necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Well, when they say "resistant to fear" I would imagine the passive aura around the DreadKnight *might* be an exception. But maybe not.
But if you look at it another way, the DK has the innate ability to strike fear in opponents. The Pally has the innate ability to ignore fear. This puts them both on an equal plane, not one above the other. After thinking about this for a minute or so, I think it's a cool idea to have them cancel each other out. And I wouldn't worry about the fear aura being the DK's ONLY advantage, lol...it's just the one thing they decided to tell us about. I'm sure as well, that the Paladin has a lot more tricks up his sleeve than group buffs and Paragon. So I wouldn't worry about it. -Eclipse
__________________
![]() Without honor - what are you but a pile of metal? |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
If there's one thing I'm looking forward to, it's putting the smack down on some goody-goody holy rollers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
nothing against my holier than thou brethren in white, but ima kill them if they let their guard down. (sorry, ima lil chaotic)
Dread knights were kept as one of the biggest secrets in the player classes for the longest time. I can believe that they only let loose the information about our passive ability just to wet our tongues abit. And mine was quite dry from all the drooling. but as they said Dks will be debuffers, pallies will be buffers. In a way i can kind of se us canceling eacother out. because even if they "cleanse" i can recast debuffs anyways. ![]() Fadeyn The First
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
All I have to say, and I realize this is a small point to make, but THANK YOU for refering to paladins as the anti-DK. Come on, I'm tired of everyone saying the opposite, "we are anti-pallies," those are probably just pally lovers who fear just how much cooler we are (I'm such a fanboy).
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
Well paladins have auras and resistant to fear
When u hear resistant to fear u get the idea of a skill check that is increased by the fact u r a paladin. But if the DK as debuff to reduce those same skill checks on a normal oponent that would make em even out and make the skill check vs a paladin or somethin. 1 of the many game design paths they can take really :lol: |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
Im thinking in regard to pvp it will mean the Paladin will be affected by our aura at a slower rate than other classes, maybe Clerics will have a means of being affected slower too, or immune to it for a short period of time.
Pvp vs Paladins will be fun imo. Always nice to meet a worthy opponent ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
|
If a Dreadnight can debuff the Paladins debuff then I don't see the fear aura being a problem. Dreadnights will be able to just dispell the buff that paladins put up and then fear away, sure it's a little more work but if it makes them fearable then why not?
|
|
|