![]() |
|
Welcome to the Vanguard Spheres forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view our discussions, articles/interviews and photo galleries. By joining our community you will gain access to post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features and tools like our upcoming Guild Management Tool (GMT). Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! As a bonus this banner will disappear once you are registered! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (105) | Article Tools |
Published by Aredhel
01-09-2007 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Kethra
on
01-09-2007, 03:24 PM
|
||||||||||
|
Re: InGame Naming Policy
Where to begin? Hmm...
To start off, I wholeheartedly agree with every naming regulation they are supporting, and I truly hope they will be able to enforce it. Yes, some people will probably argue, "I pay my subscription every month, I should get to name my character whatever I like." My counter to that is that everyone else is paying their subscription as well, so there definitely needs to be rules regarding naming. This is a given in order to keep a handle on names getting out of hand, especially since there will be younger players playing Vanguard. I agree that some of the names that form phrases can be rather clever and funny. However, the full span of these type names need to be outlawed because of course there will be those who introduce vulgarity into their names. I guess this is for the sake of humor or just to get a rise out of people, I don't pretend to know why people do the things they do. I am not a strict role-player, though I used to be in my days playing a text-based rpg called DragonRealms. Vanguard has awakened some of those old habits in me and I'd rather not happen upon a cleric named Tylenol RelievesPainFast. Just kills the immersion for me. I am thoruoughly pleased to not see a Random Name Generator upon character selection. From previous experience, I mostly attribute those "Ubijnalzz," "Gantivaaals" etc to "bot" farmers and such. I'm not saying that prohibiting the use of those nonsensical names will prevent botting, but it's a start. Mostly this reply has just been a kudos to Sigil for their naming policy and a hearty "Huzzah!" if they can manage to enforce it. Hopefully those players that agree with it as well will help in spotting violations to preserve the immersive atmosphere in their gaming environment. | |||||||||
|
Pel
on
01-09-2007, 05:03 PM
|
||||||||||
|
i like the strict naming policy too, it may even help with immature players, i hate getting in a grp and there is one smuck who thinks he rules everything cause his name was ElTurminator or something like that, with terrible spelling
![]() | |||||||||
|
Arctic_Slicer
on
01-10-2007, 05:40 AM
|
|
Re: InGame Naming Policy
I prefer to have some naming rules but I don't want them so strict that only "original" names are allowed. Some of these games go to far as to even restrict "normal" names such bob, john, or george. All of them perfectly "normal" names but because the gods of the game don't feel such names fit with a "fantasy" theme they restrict them which I think is absurd.
Also rule #5 is going to cause all kinds of problems. What constitutes recognizable media? Nobody familizes themselves with all media characters and celebrities. A few years ago when the Stromm server opened up on "EverQuest" I met a guy who had the name of Enix. The server didn't reject his name nor did he know that he was using the name of a company it was just a name he used because it sounded cool. Should someone be forced to change their name because they weren't familiar with some "recognizable" name. I would also like to note that many people, myself included, are terrible at thinking up "new" names. When creating a new character I usually use "real" people names that I like; of course most of these get rejected becuase they are not considered "fantasy" enough to be allowed. Many of my names usually come from various books I have read or video games I have played which most certainally violates rule #5 and if I still can't use those I am like to end up with one of the unpronouncable names that violates rule #12. Also don't say random name generator either as most of the names those produce suck. I am sure I am not the only one who has been forced to spend an hour or more trying to name their character because of repeated "name has been rejected, try again" messages. A strong naming policy is fine but an anal retentive one isn't and looking over that policy again it looks like it leans towards the later. With every name being reviewed by a GM and possibly changed it seems they are putting too much effort into an idealistic naming policy which could be better put elsewhere. Anyway I am tired right now so I am sure all of that didn't come out quite like I meant it but oh well. Hopefully you all get the message. |
|
Aranarth
on
01-10-2007, 10:44 AM
|
|
Re: InGame Naming Policy
I have names that I have used for characters that are loosely based on Tolkien Lore.
The names aren't Legolas for my Ranger, and Gimli for my Dwarf, but if you search the lore hard enough you can find where my login name comes from. Hopefully thats good enough for Sigil because at least two of my characters have evolved from several years of MMO play. Other than that I'm all for a good naming policy. I enjoy Guild Wars, and have played it on and off since launch. Now thats a game that needs a naming policy I'm glad we won't see that in Vanguard. |
|
Kethra
on
01-10-2007, 01:09 PM
|
||||||||||
|
Re: InGame Naming Policy
I don't think there will be any issues with using "real life" names such as Susan, George, Robert, etc. Just don't name your character Susan BAnthony, George Orwell or Robert Redford, and all should be well.
Yes this is a fantasy game, but the areas of the world are based on real world regions of Earth. Thestra is European, Qalia is more African themed, and Kojan of course is oriental. I'm sure names leaning towards these types of regional differences would be appropriate as well. Now if said character "Enix"'s name was Square Enix, we'd have issues, as it is an obvious allusion to the game company. In my mind, it is common sense to be able to adhere to these rules with out much trouble. Now, as for QforQ... ehhh, I don't know about that Maybe will depend on your race you want Q to be. | |||||||||
|
Seldane
on
01-10-2007, 01:21 PM
|
|
Re: InGame Naming Policy
I believe that a naming policy is important. For reasons such as vulgarity and people wanting to be Spiderman or Hillary Clinton and other names that obviously do not belong in the game world. Also names that make up things like ben dover are not really that funny and have all been seen or heard somewhere else. Names including numbers and unreadable names are just not necessary.
Now for names like Ivan the Hammer or whatever else along those lines to me should be acceptable. This is a fantasy game and the name of it is Saga of Heroes and people who were heroes or well known bad asses of this fantasy time period certainely had names declairing them as such. People naming their characters after NPC's doesn't bother me either because I'm sure that almost everybody out there has come across someone with the same name weather it be their first name last name or both. The world is simply to big not to have this happen here and there. Names including titles such as military ranks or other made up ranks also should be allowed because they could be part of some character backstory. They should definitely be allowed for guild members who want to display their standing in their guild. It's a great idea to keep out the racial,vulgar,and obvious names that we have all seen and heard including the numbers and unreadables but it should not limit us to only real fictional/fantasy names. |
![]() |
|