[moloka]

If they did something like EQ did I wouldn't have a problem with where we set. Pallies had buffs DK's had nice abilities also...warriors had nothing.

BUT the warrior was FAR superior in mitigation and hit points. He needed healed much much less then those pallies and DK's. Im fine with having nothing special. I like it simple. Simple is easy to perfect. Our mitigation is on line with the others and aggro is hurting.

DK's or eq's version of them SK's...had very nice ac bonus' that made them virtually untouchable...but they had to sacrifice many hps to do so. Bumping up war mitigation higher then the others by a good amount and giving us an edge on hp's would undoubtedly even the playing field.

I have been saying this for months now that the warrior taunt needed to be like EQ's taunt bring them up to scale with highest aggro person. Let the warrior pop taunt then bust off a few high aggro abilities and look...we are rock solid.

I keep referring to EQ and I know this isn't EQ. But EQ ran strong for 8 years or better...they knew what they were doing with the warrior class. They had it pegged from the get go and never let off it. They were a wonderful class in EQ to play and a person felt important as a warrior. In vanguard as a warrior I don't feel important...im the next best thing they had to settle for.