My Wrack mostly does more damage than Malice as well, it's the fact that the damages would tend to be so close to each other, as often as they were, that threw me off. One would think you would see a significant difference between the two in terms of regular damage when using the ability.
The big question I guess is if the 18 274+dmg hits form Malice II were criticals or not. I assumed they were because 4 of them were confirmed crits (also triggering Wrack I), with 6 crit 'sounds' (and not triggering Wrack) making total of 10 crits. That still leaves 8 of those hits in question. If that's the case, the ultimate question I want to know is how the trigger works on Wrack. If it's anytime you get a critical using the ability, or if your INT/WIS comes into play at all. These are things I'm just trying to get clear for myself, and maybe others out there.
I appreciate you taking the time to look at and post a few results though. I still personally think that Malice's max damage (excluding crits) should never be as high as Wrack's minimum damage, just due to how the abilities are said to work from their descriptions.
Remember, I didn't say Wrack wasn't out damaging Malice. I said:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jinxxer
Wrack I is still not over damaging Malice II as it should be. That's a simple case of (400% + 44-50) is a lot greater than (150% + 32-38 ).
|
lol...and upon reading back over that, I guess I should clarify that I meant "as
MUCH as it should be." My fault for being a bit vague there. :wink: