View Single Post
Old 01-30-2006, 06:21 PM   #30 (permalink)
Tazzrin Jaegernaut
Junior Member
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 03-08-2006 02:44 AM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1

Level: 1

HP: 0 / 0
MP: 0 / 0
EXP: 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xabassis
what?! warriors can't dual wield? oh come on people. this upsets me =| i guess i'll be torn between a tank and a DPS class after all. probabally a rog.... maybe a monk.... i wanna wield 2 swords though O.O ohwell. that makes chosing between dual wielding and a shield / sword that much easier.


no dual wield... i'll settle for a huge 2 handed sword with a spiff particle effect O.O the guy in the lore dual wields though! i read it myself! flaw in the lore, im telling you....
The fact is in any game that a warrior who is dual wielding and being the active MT will take more damage when compared to a warrior who uses a shield. I would understand dual wielding in a group or on a raid when your tank isn't the MT. However, a shield wielding tank is more viable than the suicidal dual wielders who think they can tank just as well.
Tazzrin Jaegernaut is offline