View Single Post
Old 04-17-2007, 11:33 AM   #17 (permalink)
Naiya
Senior Member
 
Naiya's Avatar
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 09-13-2007 03:10 PM
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 339

Level: 17

HP: 42 / 404
MP: 113 / 2059
EXP: 19%
Send a message via AIM to Naiya Send a message via MSN to Naiya Send a message via Yahoo to Naiya
Re: Server down at 10:41pm central

Quote:
Originally Posted by Astenniall View Post
I have to say that the server being down for this long with no word on what's going on does not bode well given the horror stories folks tell about it being down for 3 days.

I'm not sure how they expect to build a playerbase on this server if it gets zero support in situations like this. They can say all they want that this is a test server but you know what? They still take my money to be able to play on it so I should get the same respect and support as any other player. I'm doing them a favor by playing on it and not vice versa.
As someone who works in QA, this sentiment always troubles me. See, follow me for a sec...

There are a few things going on right now.

1.) this is test server. it is truly up by the whim and the grace of Sigil. There is nothing stating it HAS to be in operation at ANY time. In short, on test, we are quite literally, guests of the company. For the privilege of playing in their "sandbox"* we get to interact with them, see new stuff before it comes out and make a better game for everyone else. In short, we get to hang out with "the cool kids inside".

2.) As I have just recently learned (with quite literally weeks of nightmares pounding it into my conscious) that QA testers are only human. They can only be in one place at a time and I (completely personal *I* by the way) would prefer that they choose the place that would get the server up and running rather than posting on the boards. Now, I know the common retort is "But how long does it take to post on a single board that you are looking into it?"

Let me give you an example. I QA for Wizards of the Coast. We're a tiny little company that makes games like Dungeons and Dragons or Magic the Gathering (on and offline versions). If every time our MTGO server dropped for unplanned reasons I had to get on and "Take a few minutes to post a message saying we were working on it" I have ONE website to worry about and it would take me about three minutes (all said and done)

We're a little company with a targeted demographic. Now, Sigil has a LARGE player base with MANY fansites and each would complain if another got the message but they didn't ("What? favoritism now? - it does happen)


I mean, I don't mean to sound snippy, I'm just trying to give you a back end view. If my beta server goes down at 11 PM PDT (and it has) I'm not going to drive into the office to restart it (it's an hour drive and I've told my beta kids I'm not doing it) As such, I do not expect Sigil to either (I don't expect them to do anything I would not willingly do myself.

In reference to "doing them a favor to play on test" well yea, in a way we are. Some of us PREFER small server populations and some of us are Masochists.... I mean testers at heart. Either way we made a *conscious choice* to be on test. we can always make that choice to play on the live servers. WE are in no way, shape or form commanded to stay here on test.

I'm gonna finish my coffee and monitor the thread. I expect it will be back up before I leave for home - I hope it is cause my little Blood Mage is TOO CUTE!

*sandbox is sometimes used as the descriptor for a dev's server. I just like the feel of the word
__________________
Beta > Real life cause there are no devs to fix the bugs in real life
I beat the internet! The last guy was really hard!
My wiki page - why would anyone want to know more about me?
Naiya is offline   Reply With Quote