View Single Post
Old 03-21-2007, 08:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
geckzilla
Staff
Graphic Designer
 
geckzilla's Avatar
 
 Additional Info
Last Online: 06-07-2007 07:22 AM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 138

Level: 10

HP: 6 / 244
MP: 46 / 2136
EXP: 79%
Re: Procedural suggestion: Patch numbering

Yeah, I don't know what's so confusing about the build number. I didn't really get what the c was there for either but they've been using ####x since forever now and every new build gets a new build number, so it makes sense to Sigil even though the numbers skip around to us. It seems as simple as it can get to me.

I'm also glad they didn't go with "Here's the even more dumbed down build # for the public" and "Here's the real build #" just to keep people from asking why it doesn't go sequentially.

That, and you can see how hard they were working by counting the difference between the previous build and latest build.
__________________
geckzilla is offline   Reply With Quote