|
Re: Procedural suggestion: Patch numbering
Up to Sigil, but I would keep the build number, it makes sense. I think the reason we have a, b, c etc on testserver at the moment, is that we have had database only changes - not patches to the code base itself, so no new build number.
Clearly update 1, 2, 3 are for when the (mostly) tested code gets pushed to live, regardless of the actual build number.
|